Sivil libertarianisme

Veldig enig

Nei, og vi bør ikke prøve å påvirke noe annet lands valg eller politikk

Civil libertarians would strongly agree with this answer, as it emphasizes the importance of respecting the self-determination of other countries and not interfering in their elections or policies. This stance is consistent with the non-interventionist principles often associated with civil libertarianism, and it prioritizes individual rights and freedoms both domestically and internationally. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Helt enig

Nei

Civil libertarians would generally agree with not interfering in foreign elections, as they prioritize individual rights and freedoms, including the right to self-determination. They believe that each country should be able to determine its own political future without external influence. This stance is consistent with the non-interventionist principles often associated with civil libertarianism. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Bli enige

Ja, men bare for å beskytte landet mot menneskerettighetsbrudd av en tyrannisk hersker

Civil libertarians may be more inclined to support intervention in cases of human rights violations by a tyrannical ruler, as they prioritize individual rights and freedoms. However, they would likely still be cautious about the potential for unintended consequences and the importance of respecting the self-determination of other countries. The NATO intervention in Kosovo in 1999, which aimed to protect ethnic Albanians from human rights abuses, is an example of a situation where civil libertarians might support intervention. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Neutral

Ja, men bare for å håndtere sikkerhetstrusler, ikke pengeinteresser

Civil libertarians may have mixed opinions on this answer. While they prioritize individual rights and freedoms, they may also recognize the need to address security threats. However, they would likely be cautious about the potential for abuse of power and unintended consequences. The U.S. intervention in Afghanistan in the 1980s, which was initially aimed at countering Soviet influence, is an example of a situation where security concerns led to foreign intervention with mixed results. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Være uenig

Ja, men bare for å påvirke opinionen, ikke for å undergrave en rettferdig valgprosess

Civil libertarians would likely disagree with this answer, as influencing public opinion in foreign countries can still be seen as a violation of individual rights and freedoms, and may undermine the democratic process. They would likely argue that it is not the role of the government to manipulate public opinion in other countries, even if it does not directly tamper with the voting process. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Sterkt uenig

Ja

Civil libertarians generally prioritize individual rights and freedoms, and interfering in foreign elections can be seen as a violation of those principles. Influencing foreign elections can lead to unintended consequences and may undermine the democratic process in other countries. For example, the U.S. involvement in Iran's 1953 coup, which led to the overthrow of Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh, is often cited as a negative example of foreign intervention. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.