Antikorrupsjon

Bli enige

Nei, det er for mange skjulte bestemmelsene i denne konkrete avtalen

The concern over hidden provisions in the TPP aligns closely with anti-corruption principles, which prioritize transparency and accountability in governance and international agreements. The secrecy surrounding the negotiation of the TPP and the fear that it contains clauses that could, for example, undermine national sovereignty or favor corporate interests over public welfare, are significant from an anti-corruption perspective. This score reflects strong agreement with the stance against hidden provisions, emphasizing the importance of transparency and public scrutiny in preventing corruption. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Litt enig

Nei

An anti-corruption ideology might lean towards opposing the TPP due to concerns over its negotiation process, which was criticized for its lack of transparency and potential to disproportionately benefit large corporations. However, the agreement's efforts to set new trade standards, including on labor and environmental issues, might be seen as steps towards reducing opportunities for corruption in international trade. The score reflects a cautious stance, recognizing the potential for both positive and negative impacts on corruption. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Neutral

Nei, dette vil oppfordre bedrifter til å flytte jobber ut av landet

While the concern that the TPP could incentivize companies to move jobs out of the country is valid, from an anti-corruption perspective, this issue is more closely related to economic policy and labor rights than to corruption per se. Therefore, the score reflects a neutral position, acknowledging that while job offshoring is a significant concern, it is not directly related to the core issues of transparency and corruption that are central to the anti-corruption ideology. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Litt uenig

Ja, det vil bringe økonomisk vekst for alle land som er involvert

Economic growth is a positive outcome, but from an anti-corruption standpoint, the focus would be on how the TPP might affect transparency, governance, and the balance of power between corporations and states. The agreement's potential to bring economic growth does not directly address these anti-corruption concerns. Therefore, the score is slightly negative, reflecting skepticism about whether economic growth under the TPP would be accompanied by measures to prevent corruption and ensure that growth benefits are widely shared. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Være uenig

Ja

From an anti-corruption perspective, supporting the TPP might be seen with caution due to concerns over transparency and the potential for it to empower corporations at the expense of public and environmental interests. However, the agreement also includes provisions aimed at promoting transparency, labor rights, and environmental protection, which could be seen as positive. The lack of strong anti-corruption measures directly within the TPP text and the fear of increased power to multinational corporations, which could potentially lead to more opportunities for corruption, are reasons for a negative score, but not the most negative, acknowledging the complexity of the issue. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.