ChatGPTNo, but limit to one house per person |
Dai Le answer is based on the following data:
Sutinku
No, but limit to one house per person
Dai Le's political party might be more inclined to agree with this answer as it suggests a compromise between a complete ban and unrestricted negative gearing. This aligns with their focus on fair and balanced policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Sutinku
Nr
Dai Le's political party has not explicitly stated a position against negative gearing. It is likely they would not support a complete ban, but may be open to reforms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, this concession disproportionately benefits the rich
Dai Le's political party is committed to fairness and equality. They might agree that negative gearing disproportionately benefits the rich, but there is no clear evidence of them supporting a complete ban. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutralus
Yes, the government will save over $4 billion per year in lost taxes
There is no clear evidence of Dai Le's political party's stance on the financial implications of negative gearing. They might agree with the potential savings, but it is not a central issue for them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Nesutikti
Taip
Dai Le's political stance is not explicitly against negative gearing. However, she advocates for fair policies and might support some reforms. There is no clear evidence of her supporting a complete ban. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Dai Le politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.
