@4YYWWRC

4>4  개인 답변낙태 찬성

4>4  개인 답변예

4>4  개인 답변Marriage should be between any two adult people who want to legally bind their love for each other. No religious or government entity should have any right to make that decision for any couple unless it is incest!

4>4  개인 답변예, 우리의 정신 건강 관리 시스템은 더 높은 수준의 보살핌과 서비스를 제공하기 위해 더 많은 자금이 필요합니다.

4>4  개인 답변네, 그리고 대체 에너지 생산에 대해 더 많은 혜택을 제공해야 합니다

4>4  개인 답변Yes, but only in the safety of the general public. A court order should be sought to monitor known criminals and associates. Any suspect or associate of terrorism should absolutely be monitored without a court order to ensure every effort is made to prevent any act of terror occurring. If monitoring of anyone shows nothing suspicious, any information obtained during the time of monitoring should kept absolutely confidential.

4>4  개인 답변Yes, it should be recognised that they were the original land occupiers of Australia. It should not go to a referendum.

4>4  개인 답변네, 하지만 회생 가능성이 없는 경우에 한해야 합니다

4>4  개인 답변소득세율을 낮추고, 현존하는 모든 대기업의 조세 회피행위를 제거해야 합니다

4>4  개인 답변예

4>4  개인 답변예

4>4  개인 답변아니요

4>4  개인 답변Yes, but with less focus on military training and more focus on education and skill development Yes, but only for those who do not pursue further education or employment Yes, but only for those who are starting to build a criminal record

4>4  개인 답변예, 생활 임금으로 만들어야 합니다.

4>4  개인 답변예

4>4  개인 답변It is ironic that the average working Registered Nurse working in a private hospital can not afford private health insurance to receive care that is provided by that nurse. Healthcare services need to be accessible by everyone even if it means increased taxes for that purpose. The healthcare system must be forward moving only.

4>4  개인 답변예

4>4  개인 답변Who ever is most suitable for the position should have the position, a persons gender is irrelevant!

4>4  개인 답변예, 그러나 모든 시민을 위한 세금 공제 방식이어야 합니다

4>4  개인 답변예

4>4  개인 답변예

4>4  개인 답변아니요

4>4  개인 답변예, 그들이 남자와 동일한 물리적 시험을 통과 수

4>4  개인 답변예, 노동자와 정치가를 포함한 정부로부터 임금을 받는 모든 사람을 조사해야 합니다.

4>4  개인 답변아니, 바다에서 다시 보트를 설정하고 하드 보안 검사 및 임시 보호 비자로 해외 처리

4>4  개인 답변다국적 거대 기업에 대해서 증가하고 중소 기업에 대해서는 낮춰야 합니다.

4>4  개인 답변네,하지만 환경 규제와 감독을 증가

4>4  개인 답변아니요

4>4  개인 답변Only for those who will truly benefit from use of it, ie terminally ill people. There is too much evidence associating marijuana with psychosis and long term ill mental health

4>4  개인 답변예

4>4  개인 답변아니요

4>4  개인 답변감소시키고, 정부는 우리 국민들이 이러한 직업들을 가질 수 있도록 더 많은 유인책을 제공해야 합니다

4>4  개인 답변It should only be developed if it will benefit Australia as a whole. It needs to be regulated and should not be privatised.

4>4  개인 답변예

4>4  개인 답변Yes. Any saving should go toward lessening the government's financial deficit, public education and anything that will ultimately benefit the future of Australia. Banning negative gearing may lessen the want for people to lease out investment properties and possibly allow more first time home buyers into the market of home ownership. Foreign ownership of housing should also be eradicated.

4>4  개인 답변예, 동물 학대 법을 적용 국가에 수출 할 수

4>4  개인 답변아니, 어쩌면 나중에 저렴 때

4>4  개인 답변도움말하지만, 정치적 기부를 할 수있는 능력을 금지

4>4  개인 답변아니오, 대신에 거대 다국적 기업에 대한 세금을 올려야 합니다.

4>4  개인 답변아니, 그냥 호주 바다 일본 포경을 방지

4>4  개인 답변대신 대기업의 예, 그러나 작은 지역 농장

4>4  개인 답변예

4>4  개인 답변I don't know. I have a well paying job and can pay my bills fine, but can not yet get into the housing market as a 10% deposit minimum requirement equates to approximately my annual income. The Australian dream for the average middle class Australian is becoming harder and harder. The average land sizes in metropolitan Adelaide are ridiculous. I'm 30 now and grew up with about 500 square meters of yard to play in only 5 minutes drive out of the heart of the city of Adelaide. My children won't have a court yard to play in 30+ minutes drive out of the city.

4>4  개인 답변The pension is means tested for retirees, what makes a retired government worker any different not to mention politicians who too should be means tested for any benefit at any point in their career and life.

4>4  개인 답변Hospitals need to run #1 to benefit the patient and #2 to benefit its workers.

4>4  개인 답변늘려야 합니다, 하지만 적자 폭을 현저히 줄인 후에 그래야 합니다.

4>4  개인 답변Yes, as long as offshore income is reported and harsh penalties are enforced for anyone who deliberately evade taxes.

4>4  개인 답변우리가 국가 예산 적자를 큰 폭으로 줄일 때까지는 줄여야 합니다

4>4  개인 답변아니요

4>4  개인 답변아니요

4>4  개인 답변Our school students are the future of this country. It's frustrating that they aren't extreme priority. Regardless of who provides the funding, it needs to be distributed fairly to equally benefit students even if it's on a needs basis.

4>4  개인 답변I don't see how it matters either way. It'd just be nice to see people who genuinely want what is best for the country running it

4>4  개인 답변아니, 우리는 대신에 국가의 광범위한 부패 방지 감시를 확립해야한다