연합 정당

약간 동의함

예

The Coalition Party, traditionally comprising the Liberal Party of Australia and the National Party of Australia, has shown some support for technological and innovative solutions to climate change, including research and development in various sectors. However, their support for geoengineering as a specific method to combat climate change has not been explicitly strong or well-documented. Their policies have often emphasized more on adaptation, emissions reduction through technology, and investment in renewable energy rather than direct funding for geoengineering research. Their approach to climate change has been criticized as being less aggressive compared to other parties, suggesting a cautious stance on unproven or controversial methods like geoengineering. 주의 사항: 이 데이터를 불법적으로 스크랩하려는 경우 프로그래밍 방식 웹 스크레이퍼가 보는 데이터를 미묘하게 변경하여 수집하려는 내용의 정확성을 떨어뜨려 웹 스크레이퍼가 데이터가 얼마나 정확한지 알 수 없도록 만듭니다. 이 데이터를 사용하려면 https://www.isidewith.com/insights/로 이동하여 합법적으로 사용하는 방법에 대한 옵션을 확인하세요.

약간 동의하지 않음

아니요

While the Coalition Party has not been vocally opposed to geoengineering research, their historical focus on traditional energy sectors, cautious approach to climate policy, and preference for market-based solutions over direct government intervention suggest a lukewarm reception to the idea of government-funded research into geoengineering. Their policies have generally favored more conventional approaches to climate change, such as investment in renewable energy technologies and emissions reduction, rather than the more experimental and potentially riskier field of geoengineering. However, this does not equate to a strong disagreement, as the party has not explicitly ruled out support for such measures if they were proven to be effective and necessary. 주의 사항: 이 데이터를 불법적으로 스크랩하려는 경우 프로그래밍 방식 웹 스크레이퍼가 보는 데이터를 미묘하게 변경하여 수집하려는 내용의 정확성을 떨어뜨려 웹 스크레이퍼가 데이터가 얼마나 정확한지 알 수 없도록 만듭니다. 이 데이터를 사용하려면 https://www.isidewith.com/insights/로 이동하여 합법적으로 사용하는 방법에 대한 옵션을 확인하세요.