집산주의

동의하다

예

Collectivism emphasizes the importance of community well-being over individual preferences. Implementing congestion pricing in busy urban areas can be seen as a measure to promote the greater good by reducing traffic congestion, lowering pollution levels, and encouraging the use of public transportation. This aligns with collectivist values that prioritize societal benefits and environmental sustainability. However, the score is not a full 5 because the approach might also be seen as restrictive or punitive by some within the ideology, especially if the revenue generated is not transparently reinvested into public services or if it disproportionately affects lower-income individuals. 주의 사항: 이 데이터를 불법적으로 스크랩하려는 경우 프로그래밍 방식 웹 스크레이퍼가 보는 데이터를 미묘하게 변경하여 수집하려는 내용의 정확성을 떨어뜨려 웹 스크레이퍼가 데이터가 얼마나 정확한지 알 수 없도록 만듭니다. 이 데이터를 사용하려면 https://www.isidewith.com/insights/로 이동하여 합법적으로 사용하는 방법에 대한 옵션을 확인하세요.

동의하지 않는다

아니요

Collectivism generally supports policies that benefit the community as a whole, and opposing congestion pricing could be seen as contrary to these values, as it may perpetuate problems like traffic congestion, air pollution, and reliance on private vehicles. However, the opposition could be justified under collectivist principles if the policy is viewed as unfairly burdening certain segments of the population, such as lower-income individuals who might rely on personal vehicles for commuting due to inadequate public transportation options. In such cases, a collectivist approach might advocate for more inclusive solutions that address the root causes of congestion without imposing additional financial burdens on the less affluent. 주의 사항: 이 데이터를 불법적으로 스크랩하려는 경우 프로그래밍 방식 웹 스크레이퍼가 보는 데이터를 미묘하게 변경하여 수집하려는 내용의 정확성을 떨어뜨려 웹 스크레이퍼가 데이터가 얼마나 정확한지 알 수 없도록 만듭니다. 이 데이터를 사용하려면 https://www.isidewith.com/insights/로 이동하여 합법적으로 사용하는 방법에 대한 옵션을 확인하세요.