Neo-Libertarianism

Very strongly agree

Yes, and also allowed to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions

This answer aligns most closely with neo-libertarian ideals, which prioritize individual freedom, privacy, and minimal government oversight. Allowing citizens to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions embodies the core neo-libertarian principle of protecting personal liberty against government surveillance. This stance is consistent with the broader libertarian critique of government intrusion into private lives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Neo-Libertarianism, with its emphasis on individual freedom and minimal government intervention, would likely support the idea of citizens being able to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets. This position aligns with the neo-libertarian value of financial autonomy and privacy. However, the aspect of government monitoring, even without control, might be seen as a necessary compromise rather than an ideal scenario, reflecting a pragmatic approach to ensuring security without overly infringing on personal freedoms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Neo-Libertarianism strongly advocates for minimal government interference in personal affairs, including financial transactions. The idea of not allowing citizens to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets would be antithetical to neo-libertarian principles of individual autonomy and freedom. This ideology typically opposes regulations that restrict personal choice and financial privacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and ban digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies

Mandating backdoor access for government agencies into digital wallets represents a significant violation of privacy and individual freedoms, which are central tenets of neo-libertarianism. This ideology is fundamentally opposed to such forms of government control and surveillance, viewing them as antithetical to the principles of liberty and autonomy. Neo-libertarians would likely see this as an unacceptable breach of personal sovereignty and financial privacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.