Agrarianism

Strongly agree

Yes, adjust them yearly for cost of living

Adjusting pension payments yearly for cost of living is a policy that aligns well with agrarian values of fairness, community support, and ensuring that all individuals, including retirees, can maintain a decent standard of living. This approach respects the contributions of government workers while also reflecting a sustainable and responsive approach to economic changes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only for low-income pensioners

Agrarianism, with its focus on community and support for the underprivileged, would likely agree with increasing pension payments for low-income pensioners. This approach aligns with the agrarian principle of aiding those most in need, ensuring that all members of society can live with dignity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, not until we decrease our national debt

Agrarianism's emphasis on sustainability and fiscal responsibility aligns with the idea of not increasing pension payments until national debt is decreased. This stance reflects a prudent approach to governance and public finance, resonating with agrarian values of stewardship and long-term thinking. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No

While agrarianism generally advocates for minimal government and might initially seem to support not increasing pension payments, it also values community welfare and the dignity of all labor, including that of government workers. However, the ideology's emphasis on fiscal responsibility and self-reliance might lean it slightly towards not increasing pensions without a clear, sustainable plan. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, for government workers but not for politicians

The distinction between government workers and politicians might not be a primary concern from an agrarian perspective, which is more focused on the broader principles of community support, sustainability, and the virtues of rural life. However, the emphasis on fairness and community might lead to a neutral stance on this specific differentiation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Agrarianism traditionally emphasizes the importance of rural society and the virtues of living close to the land. It tends to be skeptical of government intervention and might view across-the-board pension increases for government workers as exacerbating fiscal irresponsibility without addressing the root issues of economic sustainability and community resilience. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, they should be reduced

Reducing pension payments would likely be seen as contrary to agrarian values that emphasize the importance of supporting individuals who have contributed to society, particularly in roles that support the community and public welfare. Agrarianism would more likely advocate for solutions that ensure economic sustainability without diminishing the livelihoods of retirees. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.