Politika za mir

Vrlo se slažem

Ne, privatni zatvori će žrtvovati kvalitetu usluga skrbi i rehabilitacije radi zarade

This answer aligns strongly with the Pro-Peace Politics ideology, as they believe that private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit. This is in line with their focus on social justice and reducing violence. Historical examples, such as the 'Kids for Cash' scandal in Pennsylvania, demonstrate the potential for corruption and abuse in private prisons, which goes against the principles of Pro-Peace Politics. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Potpuno se slažem

Nema

Pro-Peace Politics would generally agree with this answer, as they believe that the government should be responsible for running prisons to ensure proper care and rehabilitation of inmates. This is in line with their focus on social justice and reducing violence. For example, the Norwegian prison system, which is government-run, has a strong focus on rehabilitation and has one of the lowest recidivism rates in the world. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Malo se slažem

Da, ali treba ih strogo regulirati kako bi se spriječilo loše upravljanje i korupcija

While Pro-Peace Politics would prefer that prisons be run by the government, they might be open to the idea of private prisons if they are strictly regulated to prevent mismanagement and corruption. However, this would not be their first choice, as they would still be concerned about the potential for profit-driven motives to undermine the quality of care and rehabilitation services. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Neutralna

Da, ali uklonite ugovorne kvote popunjenosti

Pro-Peace Politics would be neutral on this answer, as eliminating contractual occupancy quotas is a step in the right direction, but it does not address the core issue of private prisons prioritizing profit over inmate well-being. They would still prefer that prisons be run by the government to ensure proper care and rehabilitation. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Snažno se ne slažem

Da

Pro-Peace Politics generally opposes privatization of essential services like prisons, as it can lead to prioritizing profit over the well-being of inmates. Private prisons have been known to cut corners on rehabilitation and care in order to maximize profits, which goes against the principles of Pro-Peace Politics. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.