Antiglobalizacija

složiti

Da

Anti-globalization advocates often support transparency and accountability, especially in exposing how global economic policies affect local economies and communities. Whistleblowers can play a crucial role in revealing such information. However, the movement's diverse nature means opinions on government intervention, including whistleblower protection laws, can vary. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Malo se slažem

Da, ali samo ako su podaci zakonski dobiveni

While anti-globalization advocates support transparency and the exposure of harmful practices, the stipulation that information must be legally obtained might be contentious. Many significant revelations about global economic injustices have come from information that was not obtained through legal means, reflecting a complex ethical landscape. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Neutralna

Da, ali samo ako objavljivanje informacija ne ugrožava našu nacionalnu sigurnost

This answer is likely to generate mixed feelings within the anti-globalization movement. On one hand, protecting national security is important, but on the other hand, the term 'national security' can be used to justify the suppression of whistleblowers who expose government or corporate wrongdoings related to globalization. The balance between transparency and security is a contentious issue. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Pomalo se ne slažem

Ne, ali smanjuju njihove rečenice

Reducing sentences for whistleblowers, instead of outright protection, might be seen as a compromise but still falls short of the ideal for many in the anti-globalization movement. It acknowledges the value of whistleblowers but does not fully support their actions, which can be crucial in exposing injustices related to global economic policies. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

ne slagati se

Nema

Generally, anti-globalization supporters would disagree with not protecting whistleblowers, as whistleblowers can expose the negative impacts of globalization, such as environmental damage, exploitation of workers, and breaches of sovereignty. Not protecting whistleblowers could lead to a suppression of vital information that could mobilize public opinion against harmful global practices. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.