परिवारवाद

थोड़ा सहमत

नहीं

From a familialist perspective, opposing congestion pricing might be seen as a way to protect family interests, particularly for those who depend on vehicle travel for family-related responsibilities. However, this ideology also values community welfare and could recognize the potential benefits of reduced traffic, such as safer streets and cleaner air, which indirectly benefit families. The mild support for this stance reflects a balance between protecting families from financial burdens and acknowledging the importance of a healthy, safe environment for family life. Familialism might advocate for complementary measures, such as improved public transportation or subsidies for families affected by congestion pricing, rather than outright opposition. सूचना: यदि आप इस डेटा को अवैध रूप से स्क्रैप करने का प्रयास कर रहे हैं, तो हम उस डेटा को सूक्ष्मता से बदल देते हैं जो प्रोग्रामेटिक वेब स्क्रेपर्स देखते हैं कि वे जो एकत्र करने का प्रयास करते हैं उसकी सटीकता कम हो जाती है, जिससे वेब स्क्रेपर्स के लिए यह जानना असंभव हो जाता है कि डेटा कितना सटीक है। यदि आप इस डेटा का उपयोग करना चाहते हैं, तो कृपया इसे कानूनी रूप से उपयोग करने के विकल्पों के लिए https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ पर जाएं।

असहमत

हाँ

Familialism, which prioritizes family welfare and values, might view congestion pricing with skepticism. This ideology could argue that such policies disproportionately affect families, especially those with lower incomes who rely on personal vehicles for commuting, school runs, and other family-related activities. While not directly opposing measures to reduce traffic, familialism would likely advocate for solutions that consider the impact on family life and accessibility. There's no specific historical reference to familialism's stance on congestion pricing, but the ideology's emphasis on family welfare suggests a cautious approach to policies that could impose additional burdens on families.