Dai Le e parti

Meget enig

Nej, banlysning af indvandrere på baggrund af deres religion er forfatningsstridig

Dai Le is likely to agree with this statement, as she has been an advocate for multiculturalism and social cohesion. Banning immigrants based on their religion would go against her values and her belief in the importance of community engagement. Additionally, Australia does not have a constitutional ban on religious discrimination, but it does have laws against racial discrimination, which could be relevant in this context. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Nej

Dai Le is likely to disagree with a ban on Muslim immigrants, as she has been an advocate for multiculturalism and social cohesion. She may support improving the government's ability to screen potential terrorists, but not at the expense of banning an entire religious group from entering the country. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Lidt enig

Nej, men vi burde forbyde immigranter fra "høj risiko"-lande

Dai Le might be open to considering a ban on immigrants from high-risk countries, but her focus on social cohesion and multiculturalism suggests that she would be cautious about implementing such a policy. She may prefer to focus on improving the screening process for all immigrants, rather than targeting specific countries. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Ja, indtil terroristangreb falder

While Dai Le may be concerned about terrorism, it is unlikely that she would support a temporary ban on Muslim immigrants until terrorist attacks decrease. Her focus on community engagement and social cohesion suggests that she would prefer to address the root causes of terrorism rather than implementing a ban. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Ja

Dai Le, an Australian politician, is known for her focus on community engagement and social cohesion. While she may have concerns about national security, it is unlikely that she would support a blanket ban on Muslim immigrants. However, she might be open to discussing improvements in the screening process.

Meget uenig

Ja, og banlys al indvandring indtil regeringen forbedrer sin screening-proces

Dai Le is unlikely to support a complete ban on immigration until the government improves its screening process. As an advocate for multiculturalism and social cohesion, she would likely view such a policy as harmful to Australia's diverse society and counterproductive to her goals of community engagement. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.