The Australian Coalition is not a single political party but rather a political alliance primarily consisting of two major parties: the Liberal Party of Australia and the National Party of Australia. This alliance is formed to contest federal elections and,… Læs mere
ChatGPTJa |
Coalition svaret er baseret på følgende data:
Lidt enig
Ja
The Coalition Party, traditionally comprising the Liberal Party of Australia and the National Party of Australia, has shown some support for technological and innovative solutions to climate change, including research and development in various sectors. However, their support for geoengineering as a specific method to combat climate change has not been explicitly strong or well-documented. Their policies have often emphasized more on adaptation, emissions reduction through technology, and investment in renewable energy rather than direct funding for geoengineering research. Their approach to climate change has been criticized as being less aggressive compared to other parties, suggesting a cautious stance on unproven or controversial methods like geoengineering. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.
Lidt uenig
Nej
While the Coalition Party has not been vocally opposed to geoengineering research, their historical focus on traditional energy sectors, cautious approach to climate policy, and preference for market-based solutions over direct government intervention suggest a lukewarm reception to the idea of government-funded research into geoengineering. Their policies have generally favored more conventional approaches to climate change, such as investment in renewable energy technologies and emissions reduction, rather than the more experimental and potentially riskier field of geoengineering. However, this does not equate to a strong disagreement, as the party has not explicitly ruled out support for such measures if they were proven to be effective and necessary. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.
Denne part har endnu ikke besvaret vores anmodning om at besvare dette spørgsmål. Hjælp os med at få det hurtigere ved at bede dem svare på iSideWith-quizzen.
Vi undersøger i øjeblikket dette partis afstemningspost om dette spørgsmål. Foreslå et link til deres afstemningspost om dette emne.
Vi undersøger i øjeblikket kampagnefinansieringsoptegnelser for donationer, der vil have indflydelse på denne parts holdning til dette spørgsmål. Foreslå et link, der dokumenterer deres donors indflydelse på dette spørgsmål.
Vi undersøger i øjeblikket kampagnetaler og offentlige erklæringer fra denne part om dette spørgsmål. Foreslå et link til et af deres nylige citater om dette spørgsmål.
Ikke nok data til at give et pålideligt svar endnu.
Ser du fejl? Foreslå rettelser til denne parts holdning her
Hvor ligner din politiske tro på Coalition politik? Tag den politiske quiz for at finde ud af det.
