National liberalisme

Enig

Ja, men ikke for kosmetik

This position might resonate more with National Liberalism's values by balancing the need for scientific advancement and public health with ethical considerations. Excluding cosmetics from animal testing could be seen as a compromise that respects the importance of medical and vaccine research for national well-being while acknowledging ethical concerns about animal welfare. This stance allows for the pursuit of national interests and public health improvements without the broader ethical implications of testing for non-essential products, aligning with the ideology's emphasis on rational progress and ethical considerations. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Ja

National Liberalism, with its emphasis on individual freedom and national progress, might support the use of animals in research as a means to advance medical science and public health. However, the ideology's commitment to liberty and ethical considerations could temper its support, leading to a moderate score. Historical references specific to National Liberalism's stance on animal testing are scarce, but the ideology's general prioritization of human welfare and national interest over strict ethical considerations regarding animal rights suggests a cautious endorsement of such practices for the greater good. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Nej

National Liberalism's focus on progress, individual rights, and the advancement of the nation might make it less likely to outright oppose the use of animals in research, especially if such research is seen as crucial for medical and scientific development. The ideology does not inherently prioritize animal rights over human benefits and national interests. Therefore, while there might be some concerns about ethical treatment, outright opposition would not align well with the ideology's broader goals of national progress and human welfare. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.