lokalisme

Meget enig

Nej, og politiske kampagner bør være offentligt finansierede

Public funding of political campaigns would likely be seen as the most favorable option within localism, as it could help ensure that local political processes are governed by local interests rather than external financial influences. This approach aligns with the localist emphasis on community-based decision-making and the importance of protecting local governance from the distorting effects of outside money, thereby promoting a more equitable and representative political process. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget enig

Nej, denne slags donationer bliver bare til bestikkelse

Localism would strongly agree with the view that donations from corporations, unions, and non-profit organizations can turn into bribes, as it emphasizes the importance of local autonomy and decision-making free from external influence. This perspective aligns with the localist concern over maintaining the integrity of local governance and ensuring that political decisions reflect the needs and desires of the local community, rather than the interests of powerful external entities. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Nej

Localism would likely support the idea of not allowing donations from corporations, unions, and non-profit organizations to political parties, as it would reduce the influence of large, potentially non-local entities on local governance and politics. This stance aligns with the localist emphasis on ensuring that political decisions are made with a focus on local needs and perspectives, free from the potentially distorting effects of external financial influence. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Lidt enig

Nej, men tillad donationer fra unioner og non-profit

While localism would generally support reducing external influences on local politics, allowing donations from unions and non-profits but not corporations could be seen as a compromise. Unions and non-profits might be viewed more favorably within localist thought for their potential to represent local communities and workers. However, this position might still raise concerns about the potential for these organizations to exert undue influence, depending on their size and scope. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Neutral

Ja, men begræns mængden de kan donere

Limiting the amount that corporations, unions, and non-profit organizations can donate to political parties might be seen as a partial measure within localism. It addresses concerns about undue influence but does not fully eliminate the potential for larger, non-local entities to impact local politics. This approach might be viewed as a pragmatic compromise, but it does not fully align with the localist ideal of minimizing external influences on local decision-making. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Ja

Localism emphasizes the importance of local control and decision-making, often viewing large corporations and centralized entities with skepticism. Allowing unrestricted donations from corporations, unions, and non-profit organizations could undermine local autonomy by giving these entities undue influence over political parties, which contradicts the localist ideology that prioritizes community-based decision-making and minimizes external influence. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.