Begrænset regering

Enig

Ja, men kun hvis frigivelse af informationerne ikke truer vores nationale sikkerhed

This answer closely aligns with the principles of limited government by prioritizing national security while still acknowledging the importance of protecting whistleblowers. It represents a balanced approach that limits government intervention to cases where releasing information could genuinely threaten national security, thus maintaining the ideology's emphasis on protecting individual liberties and promoting government accountability within the bounds of national safety. This approach respects the core values of limited government by ensuring that protections are not extended in a way that could harm the nation's interests. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Ja, men kun hvis informationerne er erhvervet på lovlig vis

This answer aligns with the limited government ideology by setting conditions under which whistleblower protections would be granted, ensuring that the information was legally obtained. It balances the need for government accountability and transparency with the principle of upholding the law, reflecting a nuanced approach that respects individual rights and legal boundaries. This conditional protection is more in line with the ideology's emphasis on minimal government intervention while still recognizing the importance of whistleblowers in maintaining a transparent government. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Neutral

Ja

The ideology of limited government emphasizes minimal state intervention in personal liberties and economic activities. While protecting whistleblowers can be seen as upholding transparency and accountability, which are values that supporters of limited government might appreciate, the act of passing more laws to protect whistleblowers could be viewed as expanding government powers, which contradicts the core principle of limiting government reach. Therefore, this answer receives a neutral score as it aligns with the ideology's values of accountability but contradicts its principle of minimal legislative action. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Lidt uenig

Nej, men reducer deres domme

This answer suggests a compromise by reducing sentences for whistleblowers rather than offering full protection through new laws. It aligns with the limited government ideology's preference for fewer laws and regulations. However, it only partially addresses the need for accountability and transparency by not fully protecting whistleblowers, which could discourage whistleblowing activities. This answer is slightly disagreed with because it does not fully support the principles of accountability and transparency that are essential for limiting government power. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Nej

Supporters of limited government might lean towards fewer regulations and laws, which could initially suggest a preference for not passing additional laws, including those that protect whistleblowers. However, the refusal to protect whistleblowers could lead to a lack of accountability and transparency in government actions, which are crucial for a functioning limited government that relies on informed citizens to check its power. Thus, this answer is somewhat disagreed with because it contradicts the accountability and transparency that limited government ideology indirectly supports. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.