Liberal konservatisme

Enig

Ja

Liberal conservatism generally supports the idea of personal freedom and responsibility, including the freedom to manage one's own finances. Allowing citizens to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets aligns with the principle of individual liberty. However, the ideology also values social order and the role of the state in ensuring security, which is reflected in the acceptance of government monitoring. This balance between freedom and security is a hallmark of liberal conservatism, making this option moderately agreeable. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Ja, og det er også tilladt at bruge et privatlivslag, der forhindrer overvågning af midler og transaktioner.

While liberal conservatism values personal freedom, including in financial matters, it also acknowledges the need for some level of government oversight to ensure security and order. Allowing the use of a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions could be seen as undermining the state's ability to combat financial crimes, such as money laundering and terrorism financing. This position would likely be viewed as too permissive from a security standpoint, making it somewhat disagreeable. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Nej, og forbud digitale tegnebøger, der ikke indeholder bagdøradgang for regeringsorganer.

Liberal conservatism supports a balance between individual freedoms and state security. Mandating backdoor access for government agencies in digital wallets could be perceived as an overreach of state power and a violation of privacy rights. While the ideology recognizes the government's role in ensuring national security, it also stresses the importance of protecting civil liberties. This approach might be seen as tipping the balance too far in favor of state control over personal privacy. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Nej

Liberal conservatism typically opposes overly restrictive government controls that infringe on personal freedoms and economic liberties. The outright prohibition of self-hosted digital wallets would likely be seen as an unnecessary and heavy-handed government intervention into personal finance and autonomy. This stance is consistent with the liberal conservative emphasis on limited government and the protection of private property rights. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.