Individualisme

Enig

Nej

From an individualist perspective, the notion of not increasing penalties for distracted driving aligns with the value placed on personal freedom and autonomy. Individualists might argue that individuals should be free to make their own choices, as long as those choices do not harm others. However, the caveat here is the recognition that distracted driving does indeed pose a significant risk to others, which complicates the issue. Thus, while there's a natural inclination towards opposing increased government intervention, there's also an acknowledgment of the need for some level of regulation to ensure personal choices do not endanger others. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Ja

Individualism as an ideology emphasizes personal freedom and autonomy. Increasing penalties for distracted driving could be seen as an infringement on personal liberties by dictating stricter controls over individual behavior. However, individualists also value responsibility and the consequences of one's actions, especially in how they affect others. Therefore, while there might be some support for measures that protect public safety, the emphasis on increased government penalties might be viewed with caution. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.