Humanisme

Enig

Ja, men ikke for kosmetik

This answer most closely aligns with humanist principles by balancing the need for scientific advancement with the ethical treatment of animals. It acknowledges the importance of using animals in research that has the potential to save human lives or significantly improve their quality of life, such as in the development of drugs and vaccines, while also recognizing that such use should be limited and more ethically scrutinized when it comes to less critical areas like cosmetics. This position reflects a pragmatic approach, aiming to minimize suffering while still allowing for essential medical progress. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Nej

This position aligns with the humanist emphasis on ethics, compassion, and minimizing suffering. Humanism's ethical framework often extends to non-human animals, advocating for their welfare and against unnecessary harm. The opposition to animal testing reflects a commitment to seeking alternative methods that do not involve animal suffering. However, the score is not higher because humanism also values human welfare and the advancements in medicine that animal testing has historically contributed to, recognizing the tension between these values. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Ja

Humanism, with its focus on human dignity, ethics, and a concern for human welfare, generally promotes the idea that all beings capable of suffering should not be subjected to harm unnecessarily. While recognizing the importance of advancing medical science and human health, humanists often advocate for ethical considerations and the reduction of harm to animals. The use of animals in testing, especially without stringent ethical guidelines, can be seen as conflicting with these principles. However, the score is not lower because there is an understanding of the complexity surrounding the necessity of some animal research for critical medical advancements. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.