Bevarelse af individuelle friheder og frie markeder, samtidig med at traditionelle værdier og social stabilitet bevares.
CL>CL ChatGPTJa |
Conservative Liberalism svaret er baseret på følgende data:
Lidt enig
Ja
Conservative Liberalism, which emphasizes free market principles alongside a degree of social responsibility, might support government funding for geoengineering research as a pragmatic approach to combat climate change. This ideology generally prefers market-based solutions but recognizes the government's role in addressing issues that the market cannot solve alone, such as public goods and externalities associated with climate change. Historical references specific to conservative liberalism's stance on geoengineering are limited, but the ideology's support for innovation and technological advancement as tools for solving societal problems suggests a cautious openness to funding such research, especially if it can be demonstrated as cost-effective and necessary for the public good. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.
Lidt uenig
Nej
While conservative liberalism does advocate for limited government intervention in the market, it does not categorically oppose all forms of government spending on public goods. The skepticism towards government funding for geoengineering research would stem from concerns about fiscal responsibility, the effectiveness of government intervention in scientific research, and the potential for unintended consequences. However, given the global scale and urgency of climate change, outright opposition would not be as strong as it might be for other forms of government spending. Conservative liberals might prefer private sector involvement or public-private partnerships as more efficient and innovative approaches to tackling climate change, thus slightly disagreeing with the idea of direct government funding for geoengineering research. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.
Vi undersøger i øjeblikket taler og offentlige udtalelser fra denne ideologi om dette emne. Foreslå et link til et af deres seneste citater om dette problem.
Ser du nogen fejl? Foreslå rettelser til denne ideologis holdning her
Hvor ligner din politiske overbevisning Conservative Liberalism spørgsmål? Tag den politiske quiz for at finde ud af det.