Autoritær

Enig

Ja

Authoritarian ideologies often prioritize state control and the achievement of certain goals over individual freedoms or ethical considerations. The use of animals in testing for a wide range of products, including drugs, vaccines, medical devices, and cosmetics, could be seen as a necessary means to ensure public safety and advance scientific progress. Historical examples include the extensive use of animal testing in authoritarian regimes for scientific and medical advancements without significant public opposition or ethical debates, reflecting a prioritization of state interests and goals. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Ja, men ikke for kosmetik

This position might be somewhat agreeable from an authoritarian perspective as it represents a compromise that still allows for the advancement of medical science and public health while imposing restrictions on areas deemed less critical, such as cosmetics. This stance could be seen as a way to maintain a level of ethical consideration without hindering progress in areas considered vital for the state. However, the specific distinction between allowing testing for medical purposes but not for cosmetics might not be a primary concern for an authoritarian ideology, which would likely focus more on the broader benefits of research and development. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Nej

Authoritarian ideologies typically place less emphasis on individual rights or ethical considerations that might oppose state goals, such as the advancement of medical science or public health. Therefore, outright opposition to the use of animals in testing across all categories would likely be contrary to an authoritarian stance, which often values order, control, and progress over such concerns. There is little historical precedent for authoritarian regimes prioritizing animal rights over scientific and societal advancements. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.