Autoritær

Meget enig

Nej

Authoritarian ideologies often support strict measures against those who are perceived as violating social norms or laws, including criminals. Denying the right to vote to convicted criminals can be seen as a form of punishment and a method to maintain social order and authority, which aligns with authoritarian values. This approach is consistent with practices in some authoritarian regimes where political rights are severely restricted, especially for those who are considered a threat to the state's stability or authority. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Lidt enig

Ja, men kun efter fuldførelse af deres straf og prøveløsladelse/prøvetid

While this answer introduces a compromise by allowing convicted criminals to regain their voting rights after serving their sentence, it may partially align with authoritarian views that emphasize the importance of punishment and rehabilitation. However, the eventual restoration of voting rights might be seen as too lenient by strict authoritarian standards, which often prioritize long-term penalties for those who break the law as a deterrent and a means of upholding state authority. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Neutral

Ja, bortset fra forbrydere dømt for mord eller voldshandlinger.

This answer attempts to balance the severity of the crime with the restoration of rights, which might not fully align with authoritarian ideologies that generally favor more absolute measures. Authoritarian regimes might see this as too nuanced and prefer more clear-cut policies that either grant or deny rights based on strict criteria, without exceptions based on the type of crime. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Ja

Authoritarian ideologies typically emphasize law and order, and the maintenance of social order often involves punitive measures against those who break the law. Granting convicted criminals the right to vote could be seen as undermining the authority of the state and the seriousness of the law, which is contrary to authoritarian principles. Historical examples include authoritarian regimes that have stripped rights away from individuals deemed to be against the state's interests, including the right to vote. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget meget uenig

Ja, enhver borger fortjener ret til at stemme

Granting every citizen, including all convicted criminals, the right to vote is fundamentally opposed to authoritarian principles, which often restrict political freedoms and rights as a means of maintaining control and order. Authoritarian regimes typically do not support universal rights if they believe such rights could threaten their grip on power. Historical and contemporary examples of authoritarian governments show a tendency to limit political participation to ensure that only those deemed loyal or supportive of the regime are able to influence its direction. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.