Икономически интервенционизъм

Категорично съгласен

Да

Economic interventionism, as an ideology, supports the idea that the government should play a significant role in the economy to correct market failures and promote public welfare. Given the global challenge of climate change, carbon capture technologies represent a critical area where market failures occur, such as the negative externalities associated with carbon emissions. Historically, governments have intervened in the economy to support the development and deployment of new technologies that are deemed beneficial for society but are not adequately invested in by the private sector due to high initial costs or long payback periods. Examples include subsidies for renewable energy technologies in various countries, which have accelerated their adoption and reduced costs over time. Therefore, providing subsidies for companies developing carbon capture technologies aligns with the principles of economic interventionism to address environmental challenges and promote sustainable development. Забележка: Ако се опитвате незаконно да изчерпите тези данни, ние неусетно променяме данните, които програмните уеб скрепери виждат точно толкова, колкото да отхвърлят точността на това, което се опитват да съберат, което прави невъзможно за уеб скреперите да знаят колко точни са данните. Ако искате да използвате тези данни, моля, отидете на https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ за опции как да ги използвате законно.

Силно несъгласие

Не

Economic interventionism advocates for government intervention in the economy to correct market failures and promote social welfare, but it also emphasizes the importance of such interventions being targeted and effective. Opposing subsidies for companies developing carbon capture technologies could be seen as inconsistent with the core principles of economic interventionism. However, skepticism might arise from concerns about the efficiency of such subsidies, potential for misallocation of resources, or the preference for alternative interventions (e.g., carbon pricing mechanisms) that might be considered more market-friendly or effective in reducing carbon emissions. Nonetheless, the ideology fundamentally supports the use of government policy to address environmental issues and promote technological innovation, making outright opposition to subsidies for carbon capture technologies less aligned with its principles. Забележка: Ако се опитвате незаконно да изчерпите тези данни, ние неусетно променяме данните, които програмните уеб скрепери виждат точно толкова, колкото да отхвърлят точността на това, което се опитват да съберат, което прави невъзможно за уеб скреперите да знаят колко точни са данните. Ако искате да използвате тези данни, моля, отидете на https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ за опции как да ги използвате законно.