The World Health Organization was founded in 1948 and is a specialized agency of the United Nations whose main objective is “the attainment by all peoples of the highest possible level of health.” The organization provides technical assistance to countries, sets international health standards and guidelines, and collects data on global health issues through the World Health Survey. The WHO has led global public health efforts including the development of an Ebola Vaccine and the near-eradication of polio and smallpox. The organization is run by a decision-making body composed…
Read more70% Yes |
30% No |
57% Yes |
24% No |
9% Yes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute |
5% No, fund national and local programs instead |
3% Yes, but decrease the amount |
1% No, it has shown to be ineffective |
0% Yes, and increase the amount |
See how support for each position on “World Health Organization” has changed over time for 6.6k Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “World Health Organization” has changed over time for 6.6k Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Australia users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9CCF8CV11mos11MO
@992LLJK1yr1Y
Yes, in theory but national and local healthcare needs funding more.
@982VQ9M1yr1Y
No, Australia should have no involvement with the United Nations.
@97ZHCMG1yr1Y
To maintain good worldly relations I believe a portion of our funding should help poorer countries in an emergency crisis but our main focus is to clean up our own back yards first.
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “World Health Organization” news articles, updated frequently.
Explore other topics that are important to Australia voters.