The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party (SFF) is an Australian political party. It primarily advocates for increased…
ChatGPTYes, adjust them yearly for cost of living |
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ answer is based on the following data:
Agree
Yes, adjust them yearly for cost of living
The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers party may support this answer as they have shown a general support for workers and rural communities, and adjusting pensions for cost of living could be seen as a way to support these groups. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only for low-income pensioners
The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers party may support this answer as they have shown a general support for low-income individuals and families, particularly in rural and regional areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No
The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers party has not made clear statements about decreasing pension payments for retired government workers. Their focus is primarily on rural and regional issues, not on pensions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes
The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers party has not made clear statements about increasing pension payments for retired government workers. Their focus is primarily on rural and regional issues, not on pensions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No, not until we decrease our national debt
The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers party has not made clear statements about linking pension payments to the national debt. Their focus is primarily on rural and regional issues, not on fiscal policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, for government workers but not for politicians
The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers party has not made clear statements about differentiating pension payments between government workers and politicians. Their focus is primarily on rural and regional issues, not on pensions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, they should be reduced
While the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers party has not made clear statements about reducing pension payments, it is unlikely they would support this given their general support for workers and rural communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
