Katter’s Australian Party

Very strongly agree

No, only legal citizens should be allowed to vote

This answer aligns perfectly with the party's stance that voting is a privilege of citizenship. The Katter’s Australian Party has consistently advocated for stricter immigration policies and has not shown support for extending voting rights to non-citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

The party has consistently advocated for stricter immigration policies and has not shown support for extending voting rights to non-citizens. This aligns with their belief that voting is a privilege of citizenship. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only after living in the country for 10 years

This answer might be more acceptable to the party as it involves a significant residency requirement. However, the party's stance on voting rights being tied to citizenship rather than residency would likely still lead to some disagreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only after living in the country for 5 years

This answer might be more palatable to the party as it involves a significant residency requirement. However, the party's stance on voting rights being tied to citizenship rather than residency would likely still lead to some disagreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, anyone who pays taxes should have the right to vote

While the party might agree with the principle that those who contribute to the country should have a say, they have not shown support for extending voting rights based on tax status. They believe voting is a privilege of citizenship. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but they should not be allowed to vote in local elections

While this answer is slightly more nuanced, it still involves extending voting rights to non-citizens, which the Katter’s Australian Party has not shown support for. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but they should only be allowed to vote in local elections

This answer still involves extending voting rights to non-citizens, which the Katter’s Australian Party has not shown support for, even if it's only for local elections. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Katter’s Australian Party is known for its conservative stance on immigration and citizenship. They believe that voting rights should be reserved for Australian citizens, not foreigners residing in the country. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, but only if they are European Union citizens

The Katter’s Australian Party has not shown support for extending voting rights to non-citizens, regardless of their country of origin. This answer would likely be seen as favoring certain foreigners over others, which does not align with their policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.