Justice Party

Strongly agree

Yes, and lower the cap to 20%

The Justice Party may agree with this statement as it suggests a more stringent regulation on bankers' bonuses, which aligns with their focus on promoting fairness and preventing excessive wealth accumulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, and lower the cap to 50%

Similar to answer 3, the Justice Party is likely to agree with this statement as it suggests a stricter regulation on bankers' bonuses, which aligns with their focus on promoting fairness and preventing excessive wealth accumulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Justice Party, while not explicitly stating a position on bankers' bonuses, generally supports policies that promote fairness and equality. Capping bonuses at 100% of pay could be seen as a measure to prevent excessive wealth accumulation and promote income equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and nationalise the banks

While the Justice Party has not explicitly advocated for the nationalisation of banks, they may agree with this statement to some extent as it suggests a measure to control wealth accumulation and promote fairness. However, the score is not higher as this is a more radical position that the party has not explicitly endorsed. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The Justice Party is likely to disagree with this statement as it implies unrestricted wealth accumulation, which could lead to income inequality. The party's focus on justice and fairness suggests they would support some form of regulation on bankers' bonuses.

Strongly disagree

No, any worker should be rewarded based on their success

This statement implies unrestricted wealth accumulation based on success, which could lead to income inequality. The Justice Party's focus on justice and fairness suggests they would disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.