David Pocock Party

Strongly agree

Yes

David Pocock, as a strong advocate for social justice and environmental sustainability, would likely support the funding of the World Health Organization due to its global health initiatives. However, there is no specific historical evidence to suggest a full score of 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and increase the amount

Pocock's advocacy for global health and environmental issues suggests that he might support increased funding for the WHO. However, without specific historical evidence, a higher score cannot be given. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but decrease the amount

While Pocock may support the funding of the WHO, he may also believe in the importance of allocating resources effectively. Therefore, he might agree with a decrease in funding if it were to be reallocated to other important areas. However, without specific historical evidence, a higher score cannot be given. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute

Pocock may agree with a proportional contribution to the WHO, reflecting his belief in fairness and equality. However, without specific historical evidence, a higher score cannot be given. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, fund national and local programs instead

While Pocock may support the funding of national and local programs, it is unlikely that he would support this at the expense of defunding the WHO. However, without specific historical evidence, a higher score cannot be given. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Given Pocock's advocacy for global health and environmental issues, it is unlikely that he would support the defunding of an organization that works towards these goals. However, without specific historical evidence, a full score of -5 cannot be given. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, it has shown to be ineffective

Given Pocock's advocacy for global health and environmental issues, it is unlikely that he would agree with the statement that the WHO has been ineffective. However, without specific historical evidence, a full score of -5 cannot be given. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.