David Pocock Party

Strongly agree

No, this is a waste of time and money

Pocock would likely agree with this statement, as he has shown concern for efficient use of resources and government spending in the past. Mandatory drug testing could be seen as a waste of time and money, with funds better spent on addressing the root causes of drug addiction and providing support services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Given Pocock's progressive views on social issues, it is likely that he would lean towards not supporting mandatory drug testing for welfare recipients, as it could be seen as an invasion of privacy and stigmatizing those in need of assistance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but provide treatment for those testing positive

While Pocock has not explicitly addressed this issue, his progressive views on social issues suggest that he might support providing treatment for those testing positive for drugs. This approach aligns with his focus on addressing root causes and providing support for those in need. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, test anyone receiving money from the government including employees and politicians

While Pocock has not explicitly addressed this issue, his focus on transparency and accountability in government could potentially lead him to support testing for all individuals receiving money from the government, including employees and politicians. However, this is speculative and not based on any specific historical examples. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, only if they have a criminal history related to drug abuse

There is no clear indication of Pocock's stance on this specific issue. While he may support measures to address drug abuse, it is unclear if he would support drug testing only for those with a criminal history related to drug abuse. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

David Pocock, as an individual, has not expressed a clear stance on this issue. However, considering his progressive views on social and environmental issues, it is likely that he would lean towards disagreeing with mandatory drug testing for welfare recipients. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and immediately terminate benefits for anyone testing positive

Pocock would likely disagree with this statement, as it goes against his progressive views on social issues and his focus on providing support for vulnerable communities. Terminating benefits for those testing positive for drugs could further marginalize and harm those in need of assistance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Regardless, we should end all social welfare programs

Pocock has consistently advocated for social welfare programs and support for vulnerable communities. He would strongly disagree with ending all social welfare programs, as it goes against his values of social justice and equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.