Coalition Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, but only to prevent child pornography and copyright infringement

The Coalition has been particularly supportive of internet regulation to prevent child pornography and copyright infringement. For example, they supported the Copyright Amendment (Online Infringement) Act 2015, which allows for the blocking of websites that infringe on copyright. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, maintain a blacklist of censored websites and require ISPs to retain data for two years for police investigations

The Coalition has shown support for this type of regulation. The aforementioned Data Retention Act is an example of this, as it requires ISPs to retain data for two years for use in police investigations. They have also supported the use of blacklists to block certain websites. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Coalition has generally supported some level of internet regulation, but the level of support may vary depending on the specifics of the regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but allow citizens the option to use a government funded internet filter and do not require ISPs to retain data

While the Coalition has supported internet regulation, they have not specifically advocated for a government-funded internet filter or for not requiring ISPs to retain data. However, they have not been entirely opposed to these ideas either. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The Coalition has generally supported some level of internet regulation, which contradicts the idea of no government regulation of the internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, do not censor or monitor data

The Coalition has historically supported some level of internet regulation. For example, they supported the introduction of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment (Data Retention) Act 2015, which requires ISPs to retain certain data for two years. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.