Try the political quiz

Masculism policy on corporate tax

Topics

Should Australia raise or lower the tax rate for corporations?

M>M  ChatGPTIncrease for large multinational corporations but lower for small businesses

Masculism answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Agree

Increase for large multinational corporations but lower for small businesses

This approach might be seen favorably as it aims to support small businesses, which could be owned by or employ a significant number of men, while ensuring large multinationals pay their fair share. It's a balanced approach that could be seen as beneficial from a masculist perspective for supporting male entrepreneurs and workers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Lower, but eliminate deductions and loop holes

Lowering the tax rate while eliminating deductions and loopholes could be seen as a way to stimulate the economy and create jobs, potentially benefiting men. This approach might be slightly favored for its potential to support male employment and entrepreneurship without a significant direct stance on masculism towards fiscal policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Lower

Lowering the tax rate for corporations could be seen as a way to stimulate economic growth and job creation, potentially benefiting men in the workforce. However, masculism does not explicitly address fiscal policies, making the connection indirect. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Keep current rates but eliminate deductions and loop holes

Eliminating deductions and loopholes could be seen as creating a fairer tax system, which might align with masculist views on justice and equity. However, the direct impact on men's issues is not clear, making the support mild. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Maintain the current rate

Maintaining the current rate does not directly address any masculist concerns or priorities. The stance on this issue would likely be neutral, as it does not directly impact men's rights or issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Remove taxes on corporations and tax shareholder dividends instead

While this approach shifts the tax burden and could encourage investment in corporations, potentially leading to job growth, the direct benefits or drawbacks from a masculist perspective are not clear. The impact on men's issues is indirect, leading to slight opposition due to the uncertainty of its effects on men's employment and economic opportunities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Raise

Masculism, focusing on men's rights and issues, may not have a direct stance on corporate tax rates. However, if higher taxes are perceived to negatively impact economic growth or job creation, which could affect employment opportunities for men, there might be some opposition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Masculism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.