Try the political quiz

5 Replies

 @9LWGRNCdisagreed…3wks3W

If affordable and prevents more people becoming homeless then who cares where the housing is. Id rather have a roof over my head than nothing.

 @9LP9JJQdisagreed…4wks4W

Everyone deserves the opportunity to live somewhere affordable that is close to public services and employment opportunities.

 @9LKBSV2disagreed…1mo1MO

More low density buildings in important areas of a suburb such as shopping centres and/or train stations is not efficient and doesn't give access to services for the most people.

 @9LPFMSZ disagreed…4wks4W

Urban sprawl leads to larger, further-spaced cities which increases car-dependency and deforestation. Urban sprawl is also economically inviable as it produces less tax revenue than higher density suburbs.

 @9LKBBY4 disagreed…1mo1MO

High density residential buildings allow more people to live in the same amount of space. It helps transit-oriented development, developing the area further and giving more people a roof over their head. Since it increases the supply, it also decreases the house prices. There is literally nothing bad about high density residential buildings.

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this answer.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...