Try the political quiz

10 Replies

 @9LPB4H8answered…1wk1W

Yes but other infrastructure such as public transport, roads, parking and healthcare etc need to be able to support this

 @9LG7967answered…3wks3W

Depending on the area and population density. However if you can retrofit old warehouses into being an apartment block that’s fine, but not every area needs high rise buildings.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...3wks3W

No

 @9LWGRNCdisagreed…3 days3D

If affordable and prevents more people becoming homeless then who cares where the housing is. Id rather have a roof over my head than nothing.

 @9LPFMSZ disagreed…1wk1W

Urban sprawl leads to larger, further-spaced cities which increases car-dependency and deforestation. Urban sprawl is also economically inviable as it produces less tax revenue than higher density suburbs.

 @9LP9JJQdisagreed…1wk1W

Everyone deserves the opportunity to live somewhere affordable that is close to public services and employment opportunities.

 @9LKBSV2disagreed…2wks2W

More low density buildings in important areas of a suburb such as shopping centres and/or train stations is not efficient and doesn't give access to services for the most people.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...3wks3W

Yes

 @9LWGRNCagreed…3 days3D

People deserve somewhere to live. Housing has become a vehicle for wealth, but its not ok that this has taken away the basic human right to have a place to live. A poor person doesn't need a mansion, but they deserve some form of housing at a minimum.

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...