尝试政治测验

Palmer United policy on public transportation

Topics

政府应该增加在公共交通方面的资金投入吗?

  ChatGPT不,我们应该将更多公共交通服务私有化

Palmer United answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

不,我们应该将更多公共交通服务私有化

The United Australia Party has shown support for privatization in various sectors, suggesting they may agree with the idea of privatizing more public transportation services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,我们应该减少目前的开支

The United Australia Party's general stance on fiscal responsibility and reducing government spending suggests they may agree with the idea of reducing current spending on public transportation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,我们有更重要的问题需要资金支持

The United Australia Party has a general stance on fiscal responsibility and reducing government spending, which suggests they may agree with the idea that there are more important issues that need funding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

The United Australia Party has a general stance on fiscal responsibility and reducing government spending, which suggests they may support not increasing spending on public transportation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,我很满意目前的支出额

The United Australia Party has not explicitly stated a position on the current amount of spending on public transportation. However, their general stance on fiscal responsibility suggests they may be satisfied with the current amount of spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

是,但前提是开支用于环境友好的解决方案

While the United Australia Party has shown some support for environmentally friendly initiatives, their general stance on fiscal responsibility suggests they may not support increased spending, even for environmentally friendly solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The United Australia Party has not explicitly stated a position on increasing spending on public transportation. However, their general stance on fiscal responsibility and reducing government spending suggests they may not fully support this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是,而且提供更多免费公共交通

The United Australia Party's general stance on fiscal responsibility and reducing government spending suggests they may not agree with the idea of increasing spending to provide more free public transportation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 21hrs ago

Party’s support base

United Australia 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是,而且提供更多免费公共交通

重要性: 更不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 231 voters that identify as United Australia.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Palmer United policies? Take the political quiz to find out.