尝试政治测验

缔约方  ›  Policies  ›  社会

Palmer United policy on women in combat

Topics

军队应该允许妇女在在战斗岗位中服役吗?

  ChatGPT应该,只要她们能通过与男性一样的体能测试

Palmer United answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

应该,只要她们能通过与男性一样的体能测试

The United Australia Party would likely strongly agree with this statement, as it aligns with their commitment to equal opportunity and non-discrimination, while also acknowledging the need for physical fitness in combat roles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的,阻止妇女在战斗岗位服役是歧视性的

The United Australia Party, based on its commitment to equal opportunity and non-discrimination, would likely agree with this statement, viewing any prevention of women serving in combat roles as discriminatory. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The United Australia Party has not explicitly stated its stance on women in combat roles. However, given its commitment to equal opportunity and non-discrimination, it is likely that they would support women's right to serve in combat roles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不应该,战斗角色会将女性置于性侵犯的高风险情形之中

While the United Australia Party would certainly be concerned about the risk of sexual assault, they would likely disagree with this statement as it suggests that women should be excluded from certain roles due to potential risks, which contradicts their commitment to equal opportunity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

The United Australia Party, while not explicitly stating its stance on this issue, is likely to disagree with this statement due to its commitment to equal opportunity and non-discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不,对于战斗来说女性的体力不如男性

The United Australia Party would likely disagree with this statement, as it contradicts their commitment to equal opportunity and non-discrimination. It also makes a generalization about women's physical capabilities that the party would likely reject. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不,男人更可能因为保护妇女免受危险而使任务的成功面临风险

The United Australia Party would likely disagree with this statement, as it suggests a gender bias that contradicts the party's commitment to equal opportunity and non-discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Palmer United policies? Take the political quiz to find out.