ChatGPT不,但是我们应该禁止从“高危”国家移民。 |
Palmer United answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
不,但是我们应该禁止从“高危”国家移民。
The United Australia Party has been vocal about the need for strong border control and has suggested that immigrants from 'high risk' countries should be scrutinized more closely. This score reflects their stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
不
The United Australia Party has not advocated for banning Muslim immigrants. They have, however, emphasized the need for strong border control and national security. This score reflects their stance on maintaining immigration but with strong security measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
不,根据他们的宗教禁止移民是违反宪法的
The United Australia Party has not advocated for banning immigrants based on their religion, which would be unconstitutional. However, they have expressed concerns about national security and the need for strong border control. This score reflects their stance on maintaining immigration but with strong security measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
中性
是的,禁止所有移民,直到政府改善其筛选过程
The United Australia Party has not explicitly supported a complete ban on all immigration until the government improves its screening process. However, they have emphasized the need for strong border control and national security. This score reflects their nuanced position on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
是的
The United Australia Party has not explicitly supported a ban on Muslim immigrants. However, they have expressed concerns about national security and the need for strong border control. The score reflects this nuanced position.
不同意
应该,直到恐怖袭击减少
While the United Australia Party has expressed concerns about national security, they have not explicitly supported a ban on Muslim immigrants until terrorist attacks decrease. The score reflects this nuanced position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Palmer United policies? Take the political quiz to find out.