ChatGPT不,政府绝不应该管控私营企业的定价 |
Palmer United answer is based on the following data:
同意
不,政府绝不应该管控私营企业的定价
The United Australia Party's platform often emphasizes minimal government intervention in business, which aligns with the view that the government should not regulate prices of private businesses, including those in the pharmaceutical industry. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
不,限制药品价格也会限制对研发新救命药物的投入
This answer aligns with the United Australia Party's likely stance on encouraging investment and innovation within the private sector, including the pharmaceutical industry, through less regulation and more market freedom. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
不
Given their general support for free market policies, the United Australia Party is likely to believe that the government should not regulate the prices of life-saving drugs, favoring market-driven solutions instead. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
不,但应缩短药品专利的期限
While the United Australia Party generally supports free market principles, they might see the merit in shortening the lifespan of drug patents as a compromise to increase competition and reduce drug prices without direct price regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
是的
The United Australia Party, with its libertarian and conservative leanings, generally supports free market principles and might be skeptical of government intervention in pricing, including for life-saving drugs. However, they might not be completely opposed to it if it aligns with broader national interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
是,政府应该管控所有处方药的定价
The United Australia Party's free market stance makes it highly unlikely that they would support government regulation of all prescription drug prices, as this would represent significant government intervention in the market. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
是的,我们应该有公费医疗和医疗保健
Socializing medicine and healthcare would be in direct opposition to the United Australia Party's principles of minimal government intervention and free market policies, making it highly unlikely they would support this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Palmer United policies? Take the political quiz to find out.