尝试政治测验

Palmer United policy on environmental regulation

Topics

政府是否应该提高环境法规以减少碳排放?

  Public statements不,而且当前的政府对众企业管得太多了。

Palmer United answer is based on the following data:

Public statements

回答: 不,而且当前的政府对众企业管得太多了。

Reference: “Abolish the Carbon Tax” ‐palmerunited.com

Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

不,而应该为可替代能源生产提供更多的奖励措施

The United Australia Party has shown support for alternative energy production, including nuclear energy. They may be more likely to support incentives for alternative energy production rather than increased regulations on businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不,而且当前的政府对众企业管得太多了。

The United Australia Party has expressed concerns about over-regulation of businesses by the government. They believe in reducing red tape and allowing businesses to operate with less government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

The United Australia Party generally supports less government intervention in businesses, which would likely include opposition to increased environmental regulations. They believe in free market principles and reducing red tape for businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,只用实施现行法规

The United Australia Party may agree with enforcing existing regulations rather than implementing new ones. They generally support less government intervention in businesses, which would likely include opposition to increased environmental regulations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是的,为生产替代能源提供更多激励措施

While the United Australia Party supports alternative energy production, they are less likely to support increased environmental regulations on businesses. Therefore, they may somewhat agree with this statement, but not strongly. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The United Australia Party has not explicitly advocated for increased environmental regulations on businesses. While they acknowledge the importance of the environment, their focus tends to be more on economic growth and less government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不,我认为全球变暖是一个自然过程。

While the United Australia Party may not support increased environmental regulations, they do not deny the existence of human-induced climate change. Therefore, they would likely disagree with the assertion that global warming is a natural occurrence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Updated 10小时前

Party’s support base

United Australia 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是的,为生产替代能源提供更多激励措施

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 685 voters that identify as United Australia.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Palmer United policies? Take the political quiz to find out.