尝试政治测验

Palmer United policy on coal seam gas

Topics

政府应允许在澳大利亚煤层气 (CSG) 项目吗?

  Public statements不,更多的研究工作要做,以确保没有地下水污染

Palmer United answer is based on the following data:

Public statements

回答: 不,更多的研究工作要做,以确保没有地下水污染

Reference: “Coal Seam Gas extraction could poison our water table. Coal Seam Gas needs to stop right now, until proper safeguards and proced...” ‐palmerunited.com

Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

是的

The United Australia Party has historically supported the coal industry and has advocated for the expansion of coal mining and related projects. However, they have not explicitly stated their position on Coal Seam Gas (CSG) projects, hence the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的,但增加了环境的限制和监督

The United Australia Party may agree with the need for environmental restrictions and oversight, but their strong support for the coal industry suggests they would not want these to be overly restrictive or to hinder the development of CSG projects. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的,只要项目是远离居民区

While the United Australia Party supports the coal industry, they may agree with the need to keep CSG projects away from residential areas for safety and environmental reasons. However, without a specific statement on this issue, the score is not higher. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不,更多的研究工作要做,以确保没有地下水污染

While the United Australia Party may agree with the need for research and ensuring safety, their general support for the coal industry suggests they would not support delaying CSG projects for this reason. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不,我们应该为可再生能源提供更多的资金,而不是

The United Australia Party has not shown strong support for renewable energy, and their support for the coal industry suggests they would not agree with diverting funding from CSG projects to renewable energy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Given their support for the coal industry, it is likely that the United Australia Party would disagree with a blanket ban on CSG projects. However, without a specific statement on CSG, the score is not a full -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Palmer United policies? Take the political quiz to find out.