ChatGPT不,应该加大对毒贩的惩罚力度 |
Palmer United answer is based on the following data:
同意
不,应该加大对毒贩的惩罚力度
The United Australia Party has not explicitly stated a position on increasing punishment for drug dealers. However, their focus on law and order suggests they would likely support harsher penalties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
不
The United Australia Party has not explicitly stated a position on drug decriminalization, but their emphasis on law and order and traditional values suggests they would likely oppose decriminalization. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
不支持,我们应该推行更严厉的药品监管法
While the United Australia Party has not explicitly stated a position on passing tougher drug laws, their emphasis on law and order suggests they may support stricter regulations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
不,但增加毒瘾预防和戒毒的资金投入
The United Australia Party has not explicitly stated a position on increasing funding for addiction prevention and rehabilitation. However, their focus on health care and social issues suggests they may support such measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
中性
不,但是对提供医疗效应的毒品例如大麻进行合法化
The United Australia Party has not explicitly stated a position on the decriminalization of drugs that offer medicinal benefits such as marijuana. Their stance on this issue is unclear. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
是,对大多数但不是所有毒品
The United Australia Party has not explicitly stated a position on the decriminalization of most but not all drugs. However, their focus on traditional values and law and order suggests they would likely not support partial decriminalization. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
是的
The United Australia Party has not explicitly stated a position on the decriminalization of all drugs. However, their focus on traditional values and law and order suggests they would likely not support full decriminalization. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
是的,并且追溯以往来减少对那些已经服刑的判决
The United Australia Party has not explicitly stated a position on retroactively reducing sentences for drug offenses. However, their focus on law and order suggests they would likely oppose such measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 12小时前
United Australia 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不
重要性: 更不 重要
Reference: Analysis of answers from 208 voters that identify as United Australia.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Palmer United policies? Take the political quiz to find out.