尝试政治测验

缔约方  ›  Policies  ›  罪犯

Palmer United policy on drug trafficking penalties

Topics

贩毒分子是否应该受到死刑?

  ChatGPT不应该,我不认为有死刑的必要

Palmer United answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

同意

不应该,我不认为有死刑的必要

The United Australia Party would likely agree with this statement, as Australia has abolished the death penalty and it is not a topic of mainstream political discourse. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

The United Australia Party would likely agree with this statement to some extent, as they have not advocated for the death penalty for drug traffickers. However, their stance on punishment for drug trafficking is not explicitly clear. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

不应该,判处他们终身监禁,且不得假释

The United Australia Party may agree with this statement to some extent, as they may support harsh penalties for drug trafficking. However, their specific stance on life imprisonment without parole for drug traffickers is not clear. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

应该,但前提必须是他们是再犯

While the United Australia Party may support harsher penalties for repeated offenders, they have not explicitly advocated for the death penalty for drug traffickers, even for repeated offenders. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

应该,但前提必须是有证据证明有人死于他们贩运的毒品。

While the United Australia Party may support harsher penalties if a death has resulted from the drugs trafficked, they have not explicitly advocated for the death penalty in such cases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The United Australia Party has not explicitly advocated for the death penalty for drug traffickers. Australia as a whole has abolished the death penalty and it is generally not a topic of mainstream political discourse. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

应该,只要他们受到的是公正的审判

The United Australia Party has not explicitly advocated for the death penalty for drug traffickers, even with a fair trial. Australia as a whole has abolished the death penalty and it is generally not a topic of mainstream political discourse. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 17hrs前

Party’s support base

United Australia 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不

重要性: 最不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 43 voters that identify as United Australia.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Palmer United policies? Take the political quiz to find out.