尝试政治测验

Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ policy on public transportation

Topics

政府应该增加在公共交通方面的资金投入吗?

  ChatGPT不,我们有更重要的问题需要资金支持

Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

同意

不,我们有更重要的问题需要资金支持

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party would likely agree with this statement as they believe there are more pressing issues that need funding, particularly in rural and regional areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

The party's focus is more on rural and regional issues, and they may believe that funds could be better spent on these areas rather than on public transportation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,我们应该减少目前的开支

Given their focus on rural and regional issues, they may believe that current spending on public transportation could be reduced and redirected to other areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,我很满意目前的支出额

The party has not made public transportation a key issue, suggesting that they may be satisfied with the current amount of spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

不,我们应该将更多公共交通服务私有化

The party has not made clear statements about privatizing public transportation, but their general stance on reducing government intervention could suggest a mild agreement with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

是,但前提是开支用于环境友好的解决方案

While the party is not strongly opposed to environmentally friendly solutions, their focus is more on issues related to shooting, fishing, and farming, and they may not see this as a priority. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party primarily focuses on rural and regional issues, and public transportation is not a key issue for them. While they may not be strongly opposed to increased spending on public transportation, it is not a priority for them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是,而且提供更多免费公共交通

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party is unlikely to support more free public transportation as it could lead to increased government spending, which they generally oppose. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 12小时前

Party’s support base

Shooters, Fishers and Farmers 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是,而且提供更多免费公共交通

重要性: 更不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,184 voters that identify as Shooters, Fishers and Farmers.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.