ChatGPTYes, as long as it does not threaten violence |
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ answer is based on the following data:
同意
Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence
This answer aligns with the SFF's general support for individual freedoms, but also their advocacy for responsible behavior. They might agree with this statement, as it allows for freedom of speech but sets a boundary at threatening violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech
The SFF has a history of skepticism towards government overreach, which could make them agree with this statement. However, they have not explicitly stated their stance on hate speech, and their advocacy for responsible behavior could temper their agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
是的
The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party (SFF) has not explicitly stated their stance on hate speech. However, they generally support individual freedoms, which may include freedom of speech. Therefore, they might somewhat agree with this statement, but not strongly as they also advocate for responsible behavior. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
不
Given their general support for individual freedoms, the SFF might somewhat disagree with this statement. However, they have not explicitly stated their stance on hate speech, and they also advocate for responsible behavior, which could include not engaging in hate speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
No, and increase penalties for hate speech
Given their general support for individual freedoms and skepticism towards government overreach, the SFF would likely disagree with this statement. They have not explicitly stated their stance on hate speech, but increasing penalties could be seen as government overreach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government
The SFF supports individual freedoms, which likely extends beyond just the freedom to criticize the government. Therefore, they would likely disagree with this statement, as it limits the scope of freedom of speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.