Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party

同意

不，太多无辜的人被定罪了

Considering the party's emphasis on rights and a likely concern for justice within their rural constituency, there might be a slight agreement with the argument against the death penalty due to the risk of wrongful convictions, reflecting a cautious stance on irreversible punishments. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

不应该，在监狱中消耗生命是更严厉的判决

The party's general advocacy for individual rights and a cautious stance on government power might lean them slightly towards viewing life imprisonment as a more acceptable form of punishment than the death penalty, aligning with a more conservative approach to human life. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

不

While the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party has not explicitly stated their position on the death penalty, their focus on rights and freedoms might imply a cautious approach to state-enforced penalties like the death penalty. However, without a clear stance, it's difficult to strongly agree or disagree. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

支持，但仅针对有不可否认的证据的可怕犯罪

Given the party's lack of a clear stance on criminal justice issues unrelated to their core focus areas, it's unlikely they would strongly support the death penalty, even under strict conditions. Their emphasis on individual freedoms and rights suggests a potential concern for the risks of wrongful convictions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

应该，但是应该由受害者的家人决定具体惩罚

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party's focus on policy areas outside of criminal justice reform suggests they would be unlikely to support a measure as specific and controversial as allowing the victim's family to decide on the death penalty, which could be seen as inconsistent with a structured legal system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party primarily focuses on rural issues, firearms regulation, and farming policies. There is no evidence to suggest that they have taken a stance on the death penalty, making it unlikely they would strongly agree with reinstating it without specific context to their core issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.