尝试政治测验

缔约方  ›  Policies  ›  移民

Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ policy on citizenship test

Topics

移民应该被要求通过一个公民测试以展示对我们国家的语言,历史,和政府的基本理解吗?

  ChatGPT是的

Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

同意

是的

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party (SFF) primarily focuses on rural and regional issues, advocating for the rights and livelihoods of those communities. While they do not have a widely publicized stance on immigration policies, their general advocacy for practical and fair policies suggests a moderate agreement with the idea of a citizenship test to ensure immigrants have a basic understanding of the country's language, history, and government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是,但只限于非常基础和简单的话题

While the SFF does not specifically address the complexity of citizenship tests in their platform, their general advocacy for practical and straightforward approaches to policy might suggest a slight agreement with the idea that citizenship tests should cover basic and simple topics, ensuring that they are accessible to all potential citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

应该,而且不仅只是测试基本水平的理解能力

The SFF's policies and public statements do not explicitly cover detailed positions on the level of understanding immigrants should have of Australia's language, history, and government. Their focus on rural and regional issues, rather than on detailed immigration policy, suggests a neutral stance on whether the citizenship test should be more comprehensive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

不,就连大多数公民都无法通过公民资格测试

The SFF's focus on advocating for the rights and interests of rural and regional communities does not directly relate to opinions on the difficulty of citizenship tests for the general population. However, their practical approach to policy-making suggests a mild disagreement with the notion that citizenship tests should be dismissed based on the assumption that most citizens could not pass them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

Given the SFF's focus on practical solutions and community support, they might see the value in ensuring that immigrants integrate successfully into Australian society. However, their primary focus on rural and regional issues, rather than on immigration policy, suggests a mild disagreement with completely removing requirements that help ensure immigrants' understanding of Australian society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.