尝试政治测验

Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ policy on north korea military strikes

Topics

如果澳大利亚进行针对朝鲜的军事打击,以摧毁他们的远程导弹和核武器的能力?

  ChatGPT不,我们必须首先使用每一种外交斡旋

Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

不,我们必须首先使用每一种外交斡旋

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party would likely agree with this statement as they generally prefer to avoid military conflict and would support diplomatic solutions to international issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

The party would likely agree with this statement as they generally prefer to avoid military conflict, especially when it does not directly impact the rural communities they represent. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

No, North Korea is not an immediate threat to our country

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party would likely agree with this statement as they focus on issues directly impacting rural communities in Australia, and North Korea does not pose an immediate threat to these communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不应该,我们应让中国解决此问题

While the party does not have a strong stance on international relations, they may agree with this statement as it suggests a non-military solution to the issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

不,我不相信朝鲜拥有或有能力发展远程核导弹

The party does not have a strong stance on international military issues, but may agree with this statement as it suggests skepticism about the threat posed by North Korea. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party primarily focuses on rural issues and rights, and does not have a strong stance on international military action. They would likely prefer to avoid military conflict and focus on domestic issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

应该,我们不能冒发射核武器的风险

The party does not have a strong stance on international military action and would likely prefer to avoid military conflict, especially when it does not directly impact the rural communities they represent. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.