ChatGPT不应当,我对当前的支出感到满意 |
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ answer is based on the following data:
同意
不应当,我对当前的支出感到满意
The SFF might be satisfied with the current amount of military spending, as they have not explicitly advocated for changes in this area. Their primary focus is on rural and regional issues, so they may not see military spending as a top priority. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
增长
While the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party (SFF) does not have a clear stance on military spending, they generally support policies that protect Australia's sovereignty and security. However, their primary focus is on rural and regional issues, so they may not prioritize increased military spending over other concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
增加,但是只能在我们的赤字得到大幅减少之后
The SFF might support an increase in military spending after the deficit is reduced, as they generally favor fiscally responsible policies. However, they have not explicitly stated a position on this issue, and their primary focus is on rural and regional issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
减少
The SFF is unlikely to support a decrease in military spending, as they generally favor policies that protect Australia's sovereignty and security. However, as their focus is primarily on rural and regional issues, they may not have a strong stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
都不是,我们应该创建一个欧洲军事防御系统来替代
The SFF would likely strongly disagree with the idea of creating a European military defense system instead of focusing on Australia's own military. The party is focused on Australian sovereignty and security, and has not shown support for international military alliances over national defense. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 1天前
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers 党派 Voters’ 回答: 增长
重要性: 更不 重要
Reference: Analysis of answers from 229 voters that identify as Shooters, Fishers and Farmers.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.