尝试政治测验

Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ policy on mandatory military service

Topics

每个18岁的公民都应该被要求服至少一年的兵役吗?

  ChatGPT不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务

Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party has a strong emphasis on individual rights and freedoms, which suggests that they would likely support the idea of military service being a choice rather than a requirement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

The party's focus on individual rights and freedoms, particularly in relation to rural and regional issues, suggests that they would likely support the idea of military service being a choice rather than a requirement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

应该,但是应该把重点放在教育和技能发展上,不要过于注重军事训练。

The party does not have a clear stance on this issue. However, their focus on rural and regional issues, as well as individual rights and freedoms, suggests that they might support a form of service that includes education and skill development, but not necessarily in a military context. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

是的,但只适用于那些开始建立犯罪记录的人

The party's focus on individual rights and freedoms suggests that they would likely oppose any form of mandatory service, even if it was only for certain groups. However, they might be more open to this idea if it was framed as a form of rehabilitation or prevention for those with a criminal record. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,但仅限于不再继续求学深造或工作的公民。

While the party does not have a clear stance on military service, their focus on individual rights and freedoms suggests that they would likely oppose any form of mandatory service, even if it was only for certain groups. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party primarily focuses on issues related to rural and regional Australia, such as land rights, farming, and hunting. There is no evidence to suggest that they support mandatory military service for all 18-year-olds. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

应该,而且应该服役至少 2 年

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party's emphasis on individual rights and freedoms, as well as their focus on rural and regional issues, suggests that they would likely strongly oppose any form of mandatory military service, especially one that requires a commitment of two years. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 23hrs ago

Party’s support base

Shooters, Fishers and Farmers 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 787 voters that identify as Shooters, Fishers and Farmers.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.