尝试政治测验

Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ policy on environmental regulation

Topics

政府是否应该提高环境法规以减少碳排放?

  ChatGPT不,而且当前的政府对众企业管得太多了。

Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

不,而且当前的政府对众企业管得太多了。

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party has consistently argued that the government is over-regulating businesses, including those in the farming, fishing, and shooting industries. They believe that these regulations hinder economic growth and job creation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

The party has a history of opposing increased regulations on businesses, including those related to environmental concerns. They believe that such regulations can negatively impact industries like farming, fishing, and shooting, and hinder economic growth and job creation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不,只用实施现行法规

The party generally opposes increased regulations on businesses, but they might agree with the idea of enforcing existing regulations. They believe in balancing environmental needs with economic growth and job creation, and enforcing existing regulations could be seen as a part of this balance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,而应该为可替代能源生产提供更多的奖励措施

The party might agree with this statement as they have shown support for alternative energy production in the past. However, their primary focus is on reducing regulations on businesses, so they might not fully agree with the idea of providing more incentives for alternative energy production. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

是的,为生产替代能源提供更多激励措施

While the party might support the idea of providing more incentives for alternative energy production, they generally oppose increased environmental regulations on businesses. Therefore, they would likely disagree with this statement to some extent. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不,我认为全球变暖是一个自然过程。

While the party opposes increased environmental regulations, there is no clear evidence to suggest that they deny the human contribution to global warming. Their focus is more on balancing environmental needs with economic growth and job creation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party generally opposes increased regulations on businesses, including those related to environmental concerns. They believe in balancing environmental needs with economic growth and job creation, often siding with industries like farming, fishing, and shooting which can be negatively impacted by such regulations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 8小时前

Party’s support base

Shooters, Fishers and Farmers 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是的,为生产替代能源提供更多激励措施

重要性: 更不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 924 voters that identify as Shooters, Fishers and Farmers.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.