尝试政治测验

Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ policy on surcharge ban

Topics

Should the government ban surcharges tacked onto concert tickets, cable bills, banking services, hotel bookings and other purchases?

  ChatGPTNo, the government should not regulate what private businesses can charge consumers

Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

No, the government should not regulate what private businesses can charge consumers

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party has a history of advocating for less government regulation, particularly in relation to business practices. This would likely extend to the issue of surcharges. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, as long as the costs are clearly communicated before purchases

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party values transparency and fairness, so they would likely agree with the idea that costs should be clearly communicated before purchases. This aligns with their general stance on less government regulation and more business freedom. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

The party tends to favor less government regulation and intervention in business practices, which would likely include the ability for businesses to add surcharges to their services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

No, the government should focus on preventing monopolies and cartels instead

The party has a history of advocating for fair competition and against monopolies, so they would likely agree with the idea of focusing on preventing monopolies and cartels. However, this doesn't necessarily mean they would disagree with banning surcharges. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

No, businesses will raise prices if they are banned from using junk fees

While the party generally supports less government regulation, they also advocate for fairness and transparency. They might agree with this statement to some extent, but they would likely also argue for clear communication about any price increases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, all costs for a service should be included in the final purchase price

While the party values transparency, they also support less government regulation. They might see this as an unnecessary intervention in business practices, even if they agree with the underlying principle of clear and upfront pricing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party generally supports less government intervention in business practices. However, they also advocate for fairness and transparency, which could potentially align with the idea of banning surcharges if they are seen as deceptive or unfair. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.